Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Science And Technology

Few important guidelines:

• Please do not hesitate to give an impartial review. Number of revisions can be addressed until the desired quality is achieved.
• Please reject the manuscripts which do not fall under the scope of the journal without a review.
• In case of rejection please state the reason clearly and guide them for further action if required. (Ex: if the rejection is due to the improper language and good subject you can suggest them for language editing. If the rejection is due to the subject which is out of scope state it. Etc..,)
• Adhere to the quality of language. It must be understandable by the readers all over the world.

Ethical Obligations:

• Every manuscript submitted for publication should be given fair treatment by the editor, who should evaluate each one on the basis of its own merits without taking the author's race, religion, nationality, sex, seniority, or affiliation with any particular institution into account (s).

• Manuscripts submitted for publication should be reviewed by editors as soon as possible and with the utmost care. The editor alone is in charge of deciding whether to accept or reject a manuscript. If a manuscript is deemed improper for the journal, it may be rejected without review.

• Manuscripts submitted for publication should be reviewed by editors as soon as possible and with the utmost care. The editor alone is in charge of deciding whether to accept or reject a manuscript. If a manuscript is deemed improper for the journal, it may be rejected without review.

• An editor should respect the intellectual independence of authors.

• Editorial responsibility and authority for any manuscript authored by an editor and submitted to the editor’s journal should be delegated to some other qualified person. Editorial consideration of the manuscript in any way or form by the author-editor would constitute a conflict of interest.

• Unless with the author's permission, an editor should not use unpublished facts or interpretations revealed in a submitted manuscript for their own study.

• When a manuscript is so intricately linked to an editor's research as to present a conflict of interest, the editor should make arrangements for another qualified individual to assume editorial responsibility for that submission.

• If an editor is presented with convincing evidence that the main substance or conclusions of a report published in an editor’s journal are erroneous, the editor should facilitate publication of an appropriate report or note pointing out the error and, if possible, correcting it.

• An author may request the editor not use certain reviewers in consideration of a manuscript.

• To avoid comments being made on the electronic version of the manuscript, an editor should send reviewers a PDF rather than a Microsoft Word or other electronic file.

These are the general and ethical guidelines you need to adhere to achieve the quality output of a research paper.